Mapping of WCAG 1.0 checkpoints to WCAG 2.0 success criteria

This document is a draft of WCAG 1.0 checkpoints mapped to specific WCAG 2.0 success criteria. This mapping used the Checklist of Checkpoints for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 as the starting point. Since Web developers who are currently knowledgeable about WCAG 1.0 are familiar with this tabular form of the checkpoints, this might be a good way to present information on migrating from WCAG 1.0 to 2.0.

For each WCAG 1.0 checkpoint, I first looked at the current Mapping Between WCAG 1.0 and the WCAG 2.0 Working Draft and then tried to select a success criteria under that guideline that is basically the same as the WCAG 1.0 checkpoint. In some cases, I could not identify a specific success criteria (SC) under the indicated guideline that would match the WCAG 1.0 checkpoint. These cases are identified with "No SC".

The first column indicates where there are differences between the WCAG 1.0 and 2.0 priority levels. The contents of this cell are defined as follows:

Priority 1 checkpoints

DifferenceIn General (Priority 1) WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
Mixed 1.1 Provide a text equivalent for every non-text element (e.g., via "alt", "longdesc", or in element content). This includes: images, graphical representations of text (including symbols), image map regions, animations (e.g., animated GIFs), applets and programmatic objects, ascii art, frames, scripts, images used as list bullets, spacers, graphical buttons, sounds (played with or without user interaction), stand-alone audio files, audio tracks of video, and video. GL 1.1 Level 1 SC # 1 - 4 for all except scripts, applets, plug-ins, frames.

Not required for scripts, applets, plug-ins, frames.

What about ASCII art?
  2.1 Ensure that all information conveyed with color is also available without color, for example from context or markup. GL 1.3 Level 1 SC 3
Lower 4.1 Clearly identify changes in the natural language of a document's text and any text equivalents (e.g., captions). GL 3.1 Level 2 SC 3
? 6.1 Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets. For example, when an HTML document is rendered without associated style sheets, it must still be possible to read the document. GL 1.3 No SC
? 6.2 Ensure that equivalents for dynamic content are updated when the dynamic content changes. GL 1.1 No SC
Lower 7.1 Until user agents allow users to control flickering, avoid causing the screen to flicker. GL 2.3 Level 2 SC 1
Lower 14.1 Use the clearest and simplest language appropriate for a site's content. GL 3.1 Level 3 SC 3
DifferenceAnd if you use images and image maps (Priority 1) WCAG 2.0 Success Critera
  1.2 Provide redundant text links for each active region of a server-side image map. GL 1.1 Level 1 SC 1

But redundant text links are not explicitly associated with server-side image maps as required by success criteria.
? 9.1 Provide client-side image maps instead of server-side image maps except where the regions cannot be defined with an available geometric shape. GL 1.1 No SC

GL 2.1 Level 1 SC 1? Is this a technique for making things keyboard operable?
DifferenceAnd if you use tables (Priority 1) WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
  5.1 For data tables, identify row and column headers. GL 1.3 Level 1 SC 1
  5.2 For data tables that have two or more logical levels of row or column headers, use markup to associate data cells and header cells. GL 1.3 Level 1 SC 1
DifferenceAnd if you use frames (Priority 1) WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
? 12.1 Title each frame to facilitate frame identification and navigation. GL 1.1 No SC
I don't agree that this maps to 1.1. A frame title is not equivalent to the function of the frame.

GL 2.4 Level 3 SC 4
DifferenceAnd if you use applets and scripts (Priority 1) WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
Lower 6.3 Ensure that pages are usable when scripts, applets, or other programmatic objects are turned off or not supported. If this is not possible, provide equivalent information on an alternative accessible page. GL 4.2 Level 3 SC 2
DifferenceAnd if you use multimedia (Priority 1) WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
  1.3 Until user agents can automatically read aloud the text equivalent of a visual track, provide an auditory description of the important information of the visual track of a multimedia presentation. GL 1.2 Level 1 SC 2
  1.4 For any time-based multimedia presentation (e.g., a movie or animation), synchronize equivalent alternatives (e.g., captions or auditory descriptions of the visual track) with the presentation. GL 1.2 Level 1 SC 1
DifferenceAnd if all else fails (Priority 1) WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
? 11.4 If, after best efforts, you cannot create an accessible page, provide a link to an alternative page that uses W3C technologies, is accessible, has equivalent information (or functionality), and is updated as often as the inaccessible (original) page. GL 4.2 No SC

Priority 2 checkpoints

DifferenceIn General (Priority 2) WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
  2.2 Ensure that foreground and background color combinations provide sufficient contrast when viewed by someone having color deficits or when viewed on a black and white screen. [Priority 2 for images, Priority 3 for text]. GL 1.4 Level 2 SC 1
? 3.1 When an appropriate markup language exists, use markup rather than images to convey information. GL 4.2 No SC
Higher 3.2 Create documents that validate to published formal grammars. GL 4.1 Level 1 SC 1a
? 3.3 Use style sheets to control layout and presentation. GL 1.3 No SC

GL 2.4 No SC
Not required 3.4 Use relative rather than absolute units in markup language attribute values and style sheet property values. None. User agent issue
Higher 3.5 Use header elements to convey document structure and use them according to specification. GL 1.3 Level 1 SC 1

GL 2.4 Level 1 SC 1

GL 4.1 Level 1 SC 1b
Higher 3.6 Mark up lists and list items properly. GL 1.3 Level 1 SC 1

GL 4.1 Level 1 SC 1b
Higher 3.7 Mark up quotations. Do not use quotation markup for formatting effects such as indentation. GL 4.1 Level 1 SC 1b
Higher 6.5 Ensure that dynamic content is accessible or provide an alternative presentation or page. GL 4.2 Level 1 SC 2
  7.2 Until user agents allow users to control blinking, avoid causing content to blink (i.e., change presentation at a regular rate, such as turning on and off). GL 2.2 Level 2 SC 1
Higher 7.4 Until user agents provide the ability to stop the refresh, do not create periodically auto-refreshing pages. GL 2.2 Level 1 SC 1
Mixed 7.5 Until user agents provide the ability to stop auto-redirect, do not use markup to redirect pages automatically. Instead, configure the server to perform redirects. GL 2.2 Level 1 SC 1

GL 3.2 Level 3 SC 4
Lower 10.1 Until user agents allow users to turn off spawned windows, do not cause pop-ups or other windows to appear and do not change the current window without informing the user. GL 3.2 Level 3 SC 4
Lower 11.1 Use W3C technologies when they are available and appropriate for a task and use the latest versions when supported. GL 4.2 Level 3 SC 3
Higher 11.2 Avoid deprecated features of W3C technologies. GL 4.1 Level 1 SC 1a
Lower 12.3 Divide large blocks of information into more manageable groups where natural and appropriate. GL 2.4 Level 3 SC 5 & 6
  13.1 Clearly identify the target of each link. GL 3.2 Level 2 SC 6
? 13.2 Provide metadata to add semantic information to pages and sites. GL 2.4 No SC
  13.3 Provide information about the general layout of a site (e.g., a site map or table of contents). GL 2.4 Level 2 SC 1 & 2
  13.4 Use navigation mechanisms in a consistent manner. GL 3.2 Level 2 SC 4
DifferenceAnd if you use tables (Priority 2) WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
Lower 5.3 Do not use tables for layout unless the table makes sense when linearized. Otherwise, if the table does not make sense, provide an alternative equivalent (which may be a linearized version). GL 2.4 Level 3 SC 1
Higher 5.4 If a table is used for layout, do not use any structural markup for the purpose of visual formatting. GL 4.1 Level 1 SC 1b
DifferenceAnd if you use frames (Priority 2) WCAG 2.0 Succes Criteria
? 12.2 Describe the purpose of frames and how frames relate to each other if it is not obvious by frame titles alone. GL 2.4 No SC
DifferenceAnd if you use forms (Priority 2) WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
? 10.2 Until user agents support explicit associations between labels and form controls, for all form controls with implicitly associated labels, ensure that the label is properly positioned. GL 2.4 No SC
Higher 12.4 Associate labels explicitly with their controls. GL 1.3 Level 1 SC 1

GL 2.4 Level 1 SC 1
DifferenceAnd if you use applets and scripts (Priority 2) WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
Higher 6.4 For scripts and applets, ensure that event handlers are input device-independent. GL 2.1 Level 1 SC 1

GL 4.2 Level 1 SC 2f,2g, & 2h
  7.3 Until user agents allow users to freeze moving content, avoid movement in pages. GL 2.2 Level 2 SC 2 says to allow user to pause or stop moving content. Maybe we need a Level 3 SC on avoiding moving content altogether.
Higher 8.1 Make programmatic elements such as scripts and applets directly accessible or compatible with assistive technologies [Priority 1 if functionality is important and not presented elsewhere, otherwise Priority 2.] GL 4.2 Level 1 SC 1 & 2
Higher 9.2 Ensure that any element that has its own interface can be operated in a device-independent manner. GL 4.2 Level 1 SC 2f, 2g, and 2h
  9.3 For scripts, specify logical event handlers rather than device-dependent event handlers. GL 2.1 Level 2 SC 1

Priority 3 checkpoints

DifferenceIn General (Priority 3) WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
Higher 4.2 Specify the expansion of each abbreviation or acronym in a document where it first occurs. GL 3.1 Level 1 SC 2
Higher 4.3 Identify the primary natural language of a document. GL 3.1 Level 1 SC 1
? 9.4 Create a logical tab order through links, form controls, and objects. GL 2.1 No SC

GL 2.4 Level 3 SC 2
? 9.5 Provide keyboard shortcuts to important links (including those in client-side image maps), form controls, and groups of form controls. GL 2.1 No SC

GL 2.4 No SC
Not required 10.5 Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render adjacent links distinctly, include non-link, printable characters (surrounded by spaces) between adjacent links. Deprecate
? 11.3 Provide information so that users may receive documents according to their preferences (e.g., language, content type, etc.) No match
? 13.5 Provide navigation bars to highlight and give access to the navigation mechanism. GL 2.4 No SC
Higher 13.6 Group related links, identify the group (for user agents), and, until user agents do so, provide a way to bypass the group. GL 2.4 Level 2 SC 3
? 13.7 If search functions are provided, enable different types of searches for different skill levels and preferences. GL 2.5 No SC
? 13.8 Place distinguishing information at the beginning of headings, paragraphs, lists, etc. GL 3.1 No SC
? 13.9 Provide information about document collections (i.e., documents comprising multiple pages.) GL 2.4 No SC
? 13.10 Provide a means to skip over multi-line ASCII art. GL 2.4 No SC
  14.2 Supplement text with graphic or auditory presentations where they will facilitate comprehension of the page. GL 3.1 Level 3 SC 3
  14.3 Create a style of presentation that is consistent across pages. GL 3.2 Level 3 SC 2
DifferenceAnd if you use images and image maps (Priority 3) WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
? 1.5 Until user agents render text equivalents for client-side image map links, provide redundant text links for each active region of a client-side image map. GL 1.1 No SC

I think this one should be deprecated.
DifferenceAnd if you use tables (Priority 3) WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
  5.5 Provide summaries for tables. GL 3.1 Level 3 SC 3
? 5.6 Provide abbreviations for header labels. GL 1.3 No SC
Not required 10.3 Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render side-by-side text correctly, provide a linear text alternative (on the current page or some other) for all tables that lay out text in parallel, word-wrapped columns. Deprecate
DifferenceAnd if you use forms (Priority 3) WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
Not required 10.4 Until user agents handle empty controls correctly, include default, place-holding characters in edit boxes and text areas. Deprecate

New requirements in WCAG 2.0

TBD. This section will describe new requirements introduced in WCAG 2.0 that are not currently covered in WCAG 1.0.