>3. I am not suggesting to modify the SC in a way that every foreign word, >included or not included in dictionaries, should be marked in the code with >the appropriate lang code. I am rather suggesting that _no passage or >phrase_ written in a foreign language should be marked in the code. When >possible, authors should resolve potential ambiguities in the content >modifying the wording or linking some words to glossaries and dictionaries. > >GV ok This is one that we have been thinking about a lot. No resolution >yet. http://www.w3.org/TR/i18n-html-tech-lang/ I suggest also to read this... Every word not in the declared primary language(s) must Be marked. It's rigjt reading will be an user agent issue, but the markup is a web developer or - in these times where cms are ruling - web content editor.Received on Wednesday, 29 December 2004 23:25:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:32 GMT