W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2004

RE: [2.4] Updated proposal for GL 2.4

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:51:59 -0600
To: "'John M Slatin'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, "'Jason White'" <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>, "'Sailesh Panchang'" <spanchang02@yahoo.com>
Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <auto-000162139299@spamarrest.com>

I think a way to handle this is as follows.


Under level 1 sc 1 write


"Conforming to 1.3 SC 1 "Structures and relationships within the content can
be programmatically determined." also addresses this guideline."

 
Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of John M Slatin
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 6:10 PM
To: Jason White; Sailesh Panchang
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: [2.4] Updated proposal for GL 2.4


Jason writes:
<blockquote>
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Sailesh Panchang wrote:

> If content does not comply with 1.3 SC 1, it cannot claim conformance 
> with all level 1 SC  anyway. I do not see the point of repeating the 
> same SC here under 2.4.

This has generated a lot of opposition in the teleconferences and on the
list.

Here is a suggestion, for now, let's make it a cross-reference to 1.3 L
1 SC 1.
</blockquote>
I agree that we should make this a cross-reference. And let's do it in a
way that conforms to 1.3. Does the DTD include a crossreference
attribute or linktype that's different from a simple link to a named
anchor?

John
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2004 01:52:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:32 GMT