W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2004

RE: [2.4] Updated proposal for GL 2.4

From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:09:30 -0600
Message-ID: <6EED8F7006A883459D4818686BCE3B3B2904B4@MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu>
To: "Jason White" <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>, "Sailesh Panchang" <spanchang02@yahoo.com>
Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Jason writes:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Sailesh Panchang wrote:

> If content does not comply with 1.3 SC 1, it cannot claim conformance 
> with all level 1 SC  anyway. I do not see the point of repeating the 
> same SC here under 2.4.

This has generated a lot of opposition in the teleconferences and on the

Here is a suggestion, for now, let's make it a cross-reference to 1.3 L
1 SC 1.
I agree that we should make this a cross-reference. And let's do it in a
way that conforms to 1.3. Does the DTD include a crossreference
attribute or linktype that's different from a simple link to a named

Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2004 00:09:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:51 UTC