- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:02:57 +1100 (EST)
- To: Sailesh Panchang <spanchang02@yahoo.com>
- cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Sailesh Panchang wrote: > If content does not comply with 1.3 SC 1, it cannot claim conformance > with all level 1 SC > anyway. I do not see the point of repeating the same SC here under 2.4. This has generated a lot of opposition in the teleconferences and on the list. Here is a suggestion, for now, let's make it a cross-reference to 1.3 L 1 SC 1.
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2004 00:02:59 UTC