W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2004

RE: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?

From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:24:32 +1100
Message-ID: <16478.34464.798333.991320@jdc.local>
To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Cc: "'Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG'" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org


Gregg Vanderheiden writes:
 > 
 > I'm not sure that type of content doesn't pass.   Have we checked?

On reflection, yes, it trivially passes many of the items, as most are
simply not relevant to that kind of content.

Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 01:24:53 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG: "Real Time Captioning"
Previous message: Gregg Vanderheiden: "RE: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?"
In reply to: Gregg Vanderheiden: "RE: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?"
Next in thread: Matt May: "Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:28 GMT