W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: conformance level proposal

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:58:48 +0100
Message-ID: <003201c3fc9a$930cab30$0300a8c0@iwars>
To: "WCAG WG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "Matt May" <mcmay@w3.org>


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matt May" <mcmay@w3.org>
To: "WCAG WG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 7:52 PM
Subject: conformance level proposal


I present an alternative that solves this and the following problems
with the current formulation:
- screen reader pronunciation of A, AA and AAA as similar sounds
- mnemonic for B = Basic, A = Advanced, which translates at least into
Spanish (básico/avanzado) and French (base/avancé or augmenté), which
is as far as I go linguistically

Roberto:
Also in italian:

B = Base
A = Avanzato

But at least, why don't use the old 1, 2, 3 or I, II, III ?
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 13:58:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:17:55 UTC