W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2004

Regrets: Agenda 2-26-2004

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 03:22:07 -0500 (EST)
To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0402250321250.27593@homer.w3.org>

On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:

>Hi all
>
>
>
> We have a really big teleconf call coming up this week.
>
>
>
>Time: 2100 UTC (4 PM US Eastern, 10 PM France, 8 AM Friday Eastern
>Australia)
>
>Number:  +1-617-761-6200, passcode 9224
>
>irc.w3.org 6665, channel #wai-wcag
>
>
>
>
>
>If we want to have a TR draft out before CSUN  (and we NEED to)
>
>And we want to be able to have a week to look at the draft ourselves before
>we post it (which we also need to do)
>
>Then we have to finish up all the edit approvals this Thursday.
>
>
>
>And we have a lot of them to do - or we have to roll back all the
>suggestions and rewordings etc till we have a clean doc - which is a ways
>back.
>
>
>
>Fortunately we have had a lot of discussion and suggestions - and Ben and I
>did clean up proposals on the last 3 that didn't get covered.
>
>
>
>In order for us to clear all this though - we are going to all have to read
>through the proposals BEFORE THE MEETING.   Then we can just make edits and
>notations at the meetings based on what people find - rather than walking
>through the documents line by line on the call.
>
>
>
>So here is the agenda - immediately after the procedure we will be using
>this week.
>
>
>
>
>PROCEDURE
>
>
>      Since we have so much to do - here is the procedure we worked out to
>tackle this this week.
>
>1)     Everyone read the proposals in advance of the meeting.  This is a lot
>of work but much less than the people who put them all together.
>
>2)     Send any comments, issues, and (PLEASE!) suggestions to the list
>
>3)     At 3 pm EASTERN (one hour before the call) we will pull the items
>from the list and compile them.
>
>4)     At the meeting we will try to work as quickly as possible to identify
>all the items that are all "good enough to out as a working draft" and get
>them approved and off the table.
>
>5)     Then we will tackle all the items that had postings against them that
>require discussion.  The discussions will be time limited - based on how
>many items we have and how much time there is.
>
>a.      The first goal will be to try to find wording to solve the problem.
>
>
>b.      If this can be done quickly - then we will find words to express the
>problem and put that in the document instead.  Then move on
>
>6)     If we get stuck and cannot do a) or b) quickly - we will put the item
>on a list (sometimes called a bone yard - don't know why) to come back to
>later in meeting.
>
>7)     We WILL get through. We have to.  But we can only do this if people
>READ and SEND COMMENTS in ADVANCE.  Issues raised at the meeting will be
>noted and handled at end of meeting.
>
>
>
>Please read everything in advance
>
>Please send in your comments before 3 eastern on Thursday
>
>Pease make suggestions for fixing issues you identify.
>
>
>
>Remember the goal is not to get this perfect.  The goal is to get a document
>that is clean enough that we can send it out for public review to get their
>input as well.   That means clean up what we can and make notations where we
>know we have problems or things to work out.
>
>
>
>We are behind schedule and we've pushed ourselves up against the wall. But
>we can do it.
>
>
>
>The links for the items are below - as is the link for the Feb 14th draft -
>that the comments proposals are applied against.
>
>
>
>
>AGENDA
>
>
>1)     Items that no one has concern about  (if any).
>
>a.      Find out what we have consensus on and get them off our plate
>
>b.      {see list of items to cover - immediately below}
>
>2)     What do we want the principles to be (they are now inconsistent)
>
>        http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0361.html
>
>3)     Are we happy with the combination of 1.4, 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3  into one
>guideline
>    (just yes - no question first)
>
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0340.html
>
>4)     If yes - then are there any changes to be made to 3.1 (that we didn't
>get to last week)
>
>[Same link as above]
>
>5)     Next are discussions on those items that people sent in discussion
>points on.
>
>a.      {see list of items to cover - immediately below}
>
>b.      The items will be compiled from comments sent in up to 3pm eastern
>Thursday
>
>6)     Guideline 3.2  - handling last since we don't have a proposal yet -
>and this one looks like a really tough one.
>
>7)     Any other Questions - and items on the 'bone yard' list from today's
>discussion.
>
>
>
>
>Items to cover in meeting
>
>
>The following proposals are based on the Feb 14th Draft which is at
>
><http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-20040214.html>
>
>
>
>
>
>1)     Edits to Principles
>
>       <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0361.html>
>
>
>2)     Edits to Front matter
>
>       <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0364.html>
>
>
>3)     Guideline 1.2
>
>      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0366.html>
>
>
>4)     Guideline 1.3
>
>      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0342.html>
>
>      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0345.html>
>
>      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0347.html>
>
>
>5)     Guideline 2.3
>
>      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0346.html>
>
>      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0354.html>
>
>6)     Guideline 2.4
>
>      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0367.html>
>
>7)     Guideline 2.5
>
>      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0368.html>
>
>8)     Guideline 3.1
>
>      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0340.html>
>
>      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0369.html>
>
>9)      Guideline 3.2 (Was 3.4)
>
>[NOT YET POSTED TO LIST]
>
>10)  Appendix E
>
>[NOT YET POSTED TO LIST]
>
>11)  Appendix F  (goes with
>
>      [NOT YET POSTED TO LIST]
>
>12)  Normative Formatting
>
>      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0363.html>
>
>
>
>
>
>Gregg
>
>------------------------
>
>Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
>Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
>Director - Trace R & D Center
>University of Wisconsin-Madison
>< <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848
>For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/
>
> <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Charles McCathieNevile  http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  tel: +61 409 134 136
SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe         fax(france): +33 4 92 38 78 22
 Post:   21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia    or
 W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2004 03:22:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:17:55 UTC