W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2004

RE: Mapping HTML Techniques to WCAG 2.0

From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:32:54 -0500
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040213171902.02907c80@localhost>
To: <david.donovan@hrdc-drhc.gc.ca>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Cc: <michaelc@watchfire.com>

(not related to David's question):
I should clarify that in my previous message I was disagreeing that we need 
to write a new success criterion and that I believe Guideline 4.1 is 
sufficient.

(responding to David)...
David wrote:
>  Expanding on "Authors should use the TITLE element to identify the 
> contents of a document" to perhaps identify that when you publish a 
> report from hard copy to html, one success criteria might be to ask the 
> question...Are the titles the same? If they are not, why not?

Could you explain why this should be a success criterion? I think this is 
too specific for a success criterion and propose that we generalize the 
idea and expand on it in Techniques.  In other words, we can provide 
examples and general guidance about writing good titles.  Publishing a 
report online could be one example.

>Also, "context-rich titles" is extremely subjective.

Yes, "context-rich" is subjective.  We could provide guidance in the HTML 
Techniques document.

Best,
--wendy

-- 
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
http://www.w3.org/WAI/
/-- 
Received on Friday, 13 February 2004 17:33:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:17:55 UTC