- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:19:17 -0500
- To: "Chris Ridpath" <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>, "Loretta Guarino Reid" <lguarino@adobe.com>
- Cc: "WAI-GL" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
<h1>Introduction</h1> Chris, in your judgment would it be possible to satisfy 3.1 with a top-posted reply organized like the one outlined below, or are there no circumstances under which a top-posted message could satisfy the criteria? <h1>Possible outline for a top-posted message</h1> <h2>Introductory remarks</h2> <p>Text that summarizes context of discussion and specific points that are responded to, with an <a href="#originalmessage">invitation to read the full text of the message</a>. <h2>Main message</h2> <p>Text in which the author makes his or her points, including material quoted or paraphrased from original message as needed. Yatta yatta yatta </p> <blockquote> Stuff quoted from original message. </blockquote> <p>Response to material just quoted.</p> <a name="originalmessage"><h1>Original message</h1></a> <blockquote> Full text of original message, including all quotations, snippets, responses, etc., and earlier messages contained in the body of the message, whether top-posted or interwoven. </blockquote>
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2004 16:19:18 UTC