Chris Ridpath wrote: <blockquote> We could clarify exactly what is required to avoid top-posting and then check all messages to this list to make sure they comply. Perhaps we could exclude messages that used top-posting from the archive until they were rewritten. Would that be a good thing? </blockquote> No. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Clark" <joeclark@joeclark.org> To: "WAI-GL" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 4:11 PM Subject: RE: Top-Posting And Guideline 3.1 > > > we need to encourage participation, not discourage it. Such rules > > would serve [to] intimidate people away from posting > > Yeah, insisting that people not post 2^n quantities of text for n > messages is really gonna be a barrier. > > If you can't figure out how not to top-post, delete all the preceding > text (two keystrokes on most systems: Select All, then delete, or just > Select All and start typing) and write from scratch. > > > > -- > > Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org > Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/> > Expect criticism if you top-post >Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2004 11:49:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:30 GMT