W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:31:53 +0200
Message-ID: <00e101c4592e$dff6aef0$0200a8c0@iwars>
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, <Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com>
Cc: <schwer@us.ibm.com>, <w3c-html-wg@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com>
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Cc: <schwer@us.ibm.com>; <w3c-html-wg@w3.org>; <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 3:57 PM
Subject: [w3c-wai-gl] <none>

- Access Key does not address device independence resulting in operating
system and user agent collisions. Additionally, some devices may not
a keyboard.
- Access Key requires the author to define the actual keys.
- Access key does not adequately address usability in that the user is
familiar with access keys and their purpose.
- We have a separate technique for defining main content which is a
While this is very helpful, a comprehensive mechanism to address other

Our proposal is to create an access key alternative called "access"
will allow the author to specify a standard access key without being
concerned about the device dependencies.

Roberto Scano:
The problem is write here: http://www.wats.ca/articles/accesskeys/19
There are no standards and no key available... there is no need to new
attribute but of new key-combination
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2004 10:32:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:49 UTC