W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: Audio description (was: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 [action item])

From: Mike Barta <mikba@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:00:02 -0700
Message-ID: <7DF35A0B5F67E84B9095C21C8A976418026E6052@RED-MSG-33.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Doyle" <doyleb@alaska.net>, "Joe Clark" <joeclark@joeclark.org>, "WAI-GL" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>


Omg top-posting is when you add new text to a mail at the top, where ppl
can read it, instead of at the bottom, where it flows in context of the
message.  Yet another religious debate online like sidetalkin or putting
braces on the, shudder, following line.


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Doyle
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 7:47 PM
To: Joe Clark; WAI-GL
Subject: Re: Audio description (was: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1
[action item])

So -

PhD's aside - what is top-posting?  I asked last time this was mentioned
and did not get a response.  Actually, I was accused of the same and
still have no clue.

Doyle Burnett
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Clark" <joeclark@joeclark.org>
To: "WAI-GL" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 5:55 PM
Subject: Audio description (was: New rewrite of Guideline 1.1 [action

> > We can't move all of 1.2 to 1.1 because audio description is not a
> > alternative.
> It's not any kind of alternative. It's an addition. Try watching a
> with *just* the audio description.
> By the way, I think the original message was a new record for 2004--
> top-postings. Ph.D.s continue to be unable to use E-mail.
> -- 
>     Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
>     Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
>     Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2004 21:00:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:49 UTC