W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:53:59 -0500
To: "'John M Slatin'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, "'Web Content Guidelines'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <auto-000072525712@spamarrest.com>

That was the intent.  - no change except to clean up the language to fix the
problem with how it was worded. 

 
Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of John M Slatin
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 10:46 AM
To: jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au; Web Content Guidelines
Subject: RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording



 



-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jason White
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 2:54 am
To: Web Content Guidelines
Subject: RE: 2.1 level 3 needs rewording



Gregg Vanderheiden writes:
 > 
 > 	"1. Content is designed so that it can all be operated from a
 > keyboard or keyboard interface."

If I understand rightly, this new wording is simply intended to clarify
what is currently at level 3, and not to make any substantive change.
The difference between level 1 and level 3 is that at level 3, the
exception for interactions that cannot be described in a sentence,
doesn't apply.

Assuming this is right, I agree with Gregg's latest proposal as quoted
above.

I agree also (assuming that Jason is correct in saying that this is an
editorial change rather than a substantive one).

John
Received on Saturday, 19 June 2004 02:38:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:30 GMT