W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: question: fixed vs. liquid layout

From: Jim Thatcher <jim@jimthatcher.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:31:55 -0500
To: "'Marco Trevisan'" <info@bazzmann.it>, "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Cc: "'W3C WAI'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002d01c45307$17b1c7e0$6501a8c0@JTCOM2400>

Hi Marco,

> In this case a large part of users found the new version more readable and
> better usable than the old one.

Which is new and which is old? http://www.bazzmann.com/standard/ is what you
call flexible, right? And this, http://www.bazzmann.com/, is fixed.  

But I don't now which is new. Which one was more readable and easier to use?
I hope the flexible one, http://www.bazzmann.com/standard/, but am not sure.

jim
Accessibility, What Not to do: http://jimthatcher.com/whatnot.htm.
Web Accessibility Tutorial: http://jimthatcher.com/webcourse1.htm.
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2004 14:33:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:30 GMT