W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: Is the word Short measurable

From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 07:42:28 +0200
To: <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20040615014315.SM07040@Inbox>

Ok!now i'm on train... Poor connection, so i check this night.
As told Castaldo, we need to set no number of seconds (hard to measure) but ideas about what we want as success criteria.

----- Messaggio originale -----
    Da: "Gregg Vanderheiden"<gv@trace.wisc.edu>
    Inviato: 15/06/04 7.29.38
    A: "'Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)'"<rscano@iwa-italy.org>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
    Oggetto: RE: Is the word Short measurable
    
    
    Nice Roberto, Very nice,
    
        I propose we use this instead of what we have.   Please look at it and
    comment. 
    
    1.  Audio content does not contain background sounds OR the background
    sounds are at least 20 decibels lower than the foreground audio content with
    the exception of occasional sound effects. </proposed>
    
    ALSO - I think that we should combine this one (which only has one - level 3
    success criteria) with the previous guideline.    So think about this too.
    
     
    Gregg
    
     -- ------------------------------ 
    Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
    Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
    Director - Trace R & D Center 
    University of Wisconsin-Madison 
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) [mailto:rscano@iwa-italy.org] 
    Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:09 AM
    To: gv@trace.wisc.edu; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
    Subject: RE: Is the word Short measurable
    
        <proposed>
        1.      Audio content does not contain background sounds OR the
    background
        sounds are at least 20 decibels lower than the foreground audio content
    with
        the exception of occasional sound effects. </proposed>
    
    
    ----- Messaggio originale -----
        Da: "Gregg Vanderheiden"<gv@trace.wisc.edu>
        Inviato: 15/06/04 6.50.16
        A: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
        Oggetto: RE: Is the word Short measurable
        
        
        I agree
        
          Any wordsmiths that can figure out how?
        
         
        Gregg
        
         -- ------------------------------ 
        Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
        Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
        Director - Trace R & D Center 
        University of Wisconsin-Madison 
        
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
    Behalf
        Of Roberto Castaldo
        Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 10:02 AM
        To: 'David MacDonald'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
        Subject: R: Is the word Short measurable
        
        
        The problem is that we should be able to creare a SC so that no
    particular
        kind of media is left out.
        
        I think we should find the way not to specify fixed numbers, but I
    realize
        it's almost impossible if we want to keep the SC testable; also the 20
    db
        threshold is a fixed number, but in that particular case, I feel that
    it's a
        reasonable compromise.
        
        Best regards,
        
        Roberto Castaldo
        -----------------------------------
        www.Webaccessibile.Org coordinator
        IWA/HWG Member
        rcastaldo@webaccessibile.org
        r.castaldo@iol.it
        Mobile 348 3700161
        Icq 178709294
        -----------------------------------  
        
        ________________________________
        
        Da: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] Per
    conto
        di Gregg Vanderheiden
        Inviato: venerd́ 11 giugno 2004 22.22
        A: 'David MacDonald'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
        Oggetto: RE: Is the word Short measurable
        
        
        
        Better
        
        But I think this would still eliminate all war films. 
        
        It is level 3 but… 
        
         
        
        I wonder if we can figure a way to get what we want without catching so
    much
        else that it would be ok to leave out. 
        
         
        
        
        Gregg
        
    
    

[Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.]
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2004 01:46:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:30 GMT