- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 23:34:19 -0400
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Gregg wrote: >This is just a heads up to anyone who might be interested (including >individuals from the techniques task force) that we'll be discussing the >topic of checklists next week and whether they should be normative or >informative. The central questions seem to be: 1. Do general success criteria provide enough information to determine conformance? 2. If not, is it possible to make them testable enough to determine conformance? 3. If not, should we conclude that checklists must be normative? 4. How would putting checklists on the Recommendation track effect our timeline? 5. Can we satisfy the Requirements for WCAG 2.0 with informative checklists? "WCAG 2.0: Normative checklists?" [1] attempts to frame issues for WCAG WG discussion. <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2004/06/normative-checklist-issues.html> It includes issues raised in previous summaries and discussions. Best, --wendy -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/ /--
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2004 23:34:22 UTC