W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: Revised statement on testability (was" Definition of human testability)

From: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 12:22:25 -0500 (CDT)
To: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405271221300.3242-100000@socrates.scdns.net>

> Are you being deliberately vague about what "usually" and "very similar"
> mean? For an explanation of what the working group believes has been
> achieved this is probably sufficient

I believe the term you're looking for is "inter-rater reliability," which 
is reasonably well known in subjective testing. It's not necessarily a 
problem or anything.

-- 

    Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
    Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
    Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:22:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:30 GMT