W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: PDF tags [was: Issue 556 and 669 (and 506 definition of structure)]

From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 11:27:23 -0500
Message-ID: <C46A1118E0262B47BD5C202DA2490D1A0183B0C3@MAIL02.austin.utexas.edu>
To: "Joe Clark" <joeclark@joeclark.org>, "WAI-GL" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Thanks, Joe. You're right about what's "natural" to PDF.

John


"Good design is accessible design." 
Please note our new name and URL!
John Slatin, Ph.D.
Director, Accessibility Institute
University of Texas at Austin
FAC 248C
1 University Station G9600
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/


 



-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Joe Clark
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 10:08 am
To: WAI-GL
Subject: PDF tags [was: Issue 556 and 669 (and 506 definition of
structure)]



> and the strength of PDF is that it basically strips
> out information about structure in order to preserve the visual 
> presentation as pure presentation.  Tagged PDF restores information 
> about document structure, but it's not "natural" to PDF (Loretta, 
> please correct me if I'm wrong about that-- is all PDF now Tagged 
> PDF?).

No, not by default. However, it is incorrect to say the tags are not 
"natural"; anything that's part of the PDF spec is "natural," including 
things like text, graphics, and now XML.

-- 

    Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
    Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
    Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:27:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:30 GMT