- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 23:26:43 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Time: 2100 UTC (4 PM US Eastern) Number: +1-617-761-6200, passcode 9224 irc.w3.org 6665, channel #wai-wcag 1. proposed wording for guideline 1.3, success criteria 1 (Issues 556 and 669) Tom's proposal: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0302.html> 2. proposal to move Guideline 2.4, level 2 item 1 to level 1. (Issue 780) Sailesh's proposal: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0157.html> 3. Clarification of the definition of structure (Issue 506) david's proposal: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0316.html> 4. inline warnings and user agent features: (Issue 704) David's proposal: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0320.html> 5. example 3 doesn't make a recommendation - seems like a UA problem (Issue 707) Mike's proposal: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0203.html> 6. contracted words? (Issue 776) John's proposal: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0303.html> 7. benefits and examples for 3.2 - success feedback and identification of context changes (Issues 492 and 496) Greg Gay's response: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2004May/0002.htm l>
Received on Thursday, 20 May 2004 00:26:51 UTC