W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: [SEC508] Multimedia material

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 20:13:13 +0200
Message-ID: <018801c43c3a$a0e97280$0200a8c0@iwars>
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

This is similar to the rules that we have developed for the italian
study for the guidelines, at point 18:

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 6:51 PM
Subject: FW: [SEC508] Multimedia material

A comment from another list that may be of interest here.


 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center
University of Wisconsin-Madison


From: sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu [mailto:sec508-admin@trace.wisc.edu]
Behalf Of David Baquis
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 10:33 AM
To: 'section 508 discussion list'
Subject: RE: [SEC508] Multimedia material

The Key question as to whether captioning or audio description kicks-in
the answer to the following: "Is the visual or audio information
for comprehension"?   There is no need to audio describe a person's head
that is perfectly still throughout a business meeting since that is not
information essential for comprehension.

However, words spoken on that video should be captioned, regardless of
whether they seem relevant or interesting.  An exception might be
chatter (such as background music lyrics) which is not the focus of the
dialogue or speech in the multimedia video.  Common sense applies here.
issue in plain English, is whether someone with a disability is going to
miss out on some important information.

David Baquis

Access Board

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Avila [mailto:jon@bartsite.com]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 11:16 AM
To: 'section 508 discussion list'
Subject: [SEC508] Multimedia material

Section 508 is clear that multimedia material must have synchronized
captions and descriptive audio.  However, what if the video track is
just of
a man's head talking.   What if the video track is irrelevant to what is
being said?


Jonathan Avila

Access Technology Manager

Bartimaeus Group


www.bartsite.com <http://www.bartsite.com/>

We Create Access Solutions!
Received on Monday, 17 May 2004 14:13:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:49 UTC