W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: Testing definition of levels

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 11:00:24 -0500
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <auto-000036017065@spamarrest.com>
No

We are saying that L2 items would do one or the other or both. 

 

So an SC that only does one (either one) would fit. - as would one that does
both

 

 
Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 

  _____  

From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Sailesh Panchang
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 11:04 AM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Testing definition of levels

 

<Definition of Level 2  agreed upon yesterday>

LEVEL 2 SUCCESS CRITERIA

 

   1. Increases accessibility either through either or both of the following
         a) additional facilitation of user agent based accessibility
         b) content and/or presentation that provides direct accessibility
without              requiring the user or their user agent to do  anything
different from              users without disabilities

</Definition of Level 2  agreed upon yesterday>

Now read:

<Level 2 SC 1 for Guideline 1.3>

Information presented using color is also available without color and
without having to interpret markup (for example through context or text
coding).

</Level 2 SC 1 for Guideline 1.3>

My question:

The   Level 2 SC 1 for Guideline 1.3 explicitly excludes mark-up as a method
of achieving accessibility. So this violates the definition of level 2 as it
permits (a) or (b) or both. Right?

Sailesh Panchang
Senior Accessibility Engineer 
Deque Systems,11180  Sunrise Valley Drive, 
4th Floor, Reston VA 20191
Tel: 703-225-0380 Extension 105 
E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com
Fax: 703-225-0387
* Look up <http://www.deque.com> *

 


 
Received on Friday, 14 May 2004 12:00:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:30 GMT