W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

Agenda - May 13, 2004

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 20:37:08 -0500
Message-Id: <200405120137.i4C1bWa01849@relay4.san1.attens.com>
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Time: 2100 UTC (4 PM US Eastern)
Number:  +1-617-761-6200, passcode 9224 
irc.w3.org 6665, channel #wai-wcag

1. working definition of the criteria for placing items in each of the
three levels:
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0180.html> 

2. proposed wording for guideline 1.3, success criteria 1 (Issues 556 and
669)
Tom's proposal: 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0302.html>

3. proposal to move Guideline 2.4, level 2 item 1 to level 1. (Issue 780) 
Sailesh's proposal:
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0157.html> 

4. Clarification of the definition of structure (Issue 506)
david's proposal: 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0316.html> 

5. inline warnings and user agent features: (Issue 704) 
David's proposal: 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0320.html> 

6. example 3 doesn't make a recommendation - seems like a UA problem (Issue
707)
Mike's proposal: 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0203.html> 

7. contracted words? (Issue 776)
John's proposal: 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0303.html> 

8. benefits and examples for 3.2 - success feedback and identification of
context changes (Issues 492 and 496)
Greg Gay's response:
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2004May/0002.htm
l> 
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2004 21:37:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:29 GMT