W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: Issue 707

From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 00:06:34 +0200
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200404291804750.SM03920@Inbox>


Why don't refer to viewpoint instead of frames and new windows, like in uaag 1.0?
----- Messaggio originale -----
    Da: "Mike Barta"<mikba@microsoft.com>
    Inviato: 29/04/04 22.25.52
    A: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
    Oggetto: Issue 707
      
    Gl3.2 example3:
    frames that do not track history making the back button behave
    unexpectedly. 
    
    Issue requests clarity on the purpose and recommendation of the example.
    
    The issue that is being raised is that if a frame is navigated  without
    adding to history then the users back button will not go back to the
    prior page, but rather to the last page that was entered into history.
    
    Outside of clarity the current phrasing is quite HTML centric.
    
    Propose:
    
    
    Example 3: preserve navigational history
    
    If UA supports navigaional history content author should not alter the
    history nor should they prevent the current page from being added to the
    history collection as these actions would make navigation unpredictable.
    
    
        

[Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.]
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2004 18:07:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:29 GMT