W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: Agenda April 29th: Level 1 Success Criteria

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:11:47 -0400 (EDT)
To: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
Cc: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0404291009590.16875@homer.w3.org>

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, John M Slatin wrote:

>There's at least one problem with my proposed wording for the explnation of Level 1 success criteria:
>I wrote:
>    1. Do not set limits on content or presentation;
>The problem is that it's incorrect: by requiring text equivalents for
>non-text elements we *are* making demands on content and presentation (alt
>text, captions, and longdescs all involve content, and they have to be
>presented somehow).
>I think we can delete this item and leave the remaining ones in place.
>Doing so might even have the benefit of making the difference between Levels
>1 and 2 clearer.

This makes sense to me, but given that I am still guessing at what the actual
requirements will be I am not certain yet how to apply priorities...


Received on Thursday, 29 April 2004 10:13:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:49 UTC