RE: Agenda April 29th: Level 1 Success Criteria

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, John M Slatin wrote:

>
>There's at least one problem with my proposed wording for the explnation of Level 1 success criteria:
>
>I wrote:
>LEVEL 1 SUCCESS CRITERIA
>
>    1. Do not set limits on content or presentation;
>
>The problem is that it's incorrect: by requiring text equivalents for
>non-text elements we *are* making demands on content and presentation (alt
>text, captions, and longdescs all involve content, and they have to be
>presented somehow).
>
>I think we can delete this item and leave the remaining ones in place.
>Doing so might even have the benefit of making the difference between Levels
>1 and 2 clearer.

This makes sense to me, but given that I am still guessing at what the actual
requirements will be I am not certain yet how to apply priorities...

cheers

Chaals