W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: 2 or 3 Levels

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:12:21 +1000
Message-Id: <5956A8A2-8F32-11D8-913D-000A958826AA@sidar.org>
Cc: "'WAI-GL'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "'Matt May'" <mcmay@w3.org>
To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>

Just to reiterate the position of the Sidar WCAG2-espa group:

We think it is a bad idea to discuss any kind of prioritisation of the 
checkpoints at this stage, since we don't have enough clarity about 
what the actual requirements are going to be. When they are more 
settled, and it is clear what benefits whom, we will be in a position 
to revisit this issue with the necessary information at hand. At that 
time we agree that it makes sense to do so. In the meantime we assume 
that it is likely there will be some kind of levels to take account of 
differing benefits, but don't want to try and pre-determine what they 
should be.

cheers

On 16 Apr 2004, at 08:55, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:

> We needed to have a decision as to whether to rework the guidelines 
> from 3
> levels to two - and at the meeting (and in the email) I stated that the
> conclusion of the vote was that we would continue with 3 levels.
>
> At the meeting I was also careful to close by saying that it looked 
> like we
> should continue then with three levels but that we would revisit the 
> whole
> question again after we had cleaned up the document and knew what the 
> final
> items looked like.
>
--
Charles McCathieNevile                          Fundación Sidar
charles@sidar.org                                http://www.sidar.org
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 19:15:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:29 GMT