- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 23:18:49 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Time: 2100 UTC
(4 PM US Eastern, 10 PM France, 8 AM Friday Eastern Australia)
Number: +1-617-761-6200, passcode 9224
irc.w3.org 6665, channel #wai-wcag
Agenda for this week
1 - Finish discussion of Ian's proposal
2 - Confirm consensus from last week
a) - No conformance lower than minimum (was A)
(i.e. no A-)
b) - There is nothing that we can do or should do to prevent
people from reporting progress they have made between levels
3 - Two topics discussed but we didn’t close out conversation or reach
consensus.
a) - Whether there should be any "process" claims
(e.g. we worked on access) in lieu of access outcome.
b) - Whether there would be any formal conformance statements
between levels (e.g. A+)
4 - Definition of Levels?
a) - what are the goals of the different levels (the general
explanation)
?? L1 - Things the author must do so that something can be made
accessible
?? L2 - Things the author can do to make content accessible
?? L3 - Things author can do that are not generally applicable or are
very hard
b) - what are our specific criterion for putting things into different
levels
5 - Consensus continued
(primary goal is to collect all ideas - identify consensus
if there are any easy issues.)
a) - Should we allow scoping of conformance? If not why not.
If so why so - and how?
b) - Is sampling OK for large sites or not? Why? If so -
any restrictions? Resampling?
c) - How about aggregated content?
Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center
University of Wisconsin-Madison
> irc from last week: http://www.w3.org/2004/04/01-wai-wcag-irc.html
--
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
http://www.w3.org/WAI/
/--
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2004 00:19:27 UTC