Concise is a better word. Is that also an unusual word. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yvette P. Hoitink Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:13 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: HTML techniques - "Terse" substitutes for header labels (no blocker) Going over the HTML techniques draft, I came across the technique called "Terse substitutes for header labels": <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-HTML-TECHS-20031020.html#datatabl es_abbr> I am not a native speaker of English, but I do read a lot of books and articles in English (on average 500-1000 pages per week for the last 10 years or so) so I do not think I have a limited vocabulary. However, I had never heard of the word "terse" before. When I looked it up using dictionary.com, it said "Brief and to the point; effectively concise". Wouldn't "brief" be a better word, i.e. "Brief substitutes for header labels". Or even "short", to use the simplest words to convey the meaning. Yvette Hoitink CEO Heritas, Enschede, The NetherlandsReceived on Friday, 31 October 2003 12:49:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:26 GMT