W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2003

HTML techniques - Alt-texts for images (no blocker?)

From: Yvette P. Hoitink <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:58:50 +0100
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E1AFbfm-0006HN-Iw@smtp5.home.nl>

In the HTML techniques document, there is a technique called "Short text
equivalents for img elements ("alt-text")":

What seems to be missing here, is the explanation of when to use null
alt-text. I remember visiting a website, built by a company who just got
interested in accessibility. They used a lot of spacer images to enforce
layout, each of which had an alt-text saying "Image used for presentational
purposes only". Can you imagine how crazy that drove their blind visitors?
This is a textbook case of when to use null alt-text. 

Another example of when to use null alt-text is when the alternative text is
already present in the page, for example if have a gallery of pictures where
the title of the image is printed below it. Another example is the combined
use of an icon and text as a link, which is discussed elsewhere on the page:

Besides the lack of explanation about when to use null alt-text, I think we
need some more techniques for providing text equivalents. The WCAG
guidelines version 2 are worded such, that these last two examples I gave
count as providing a text equivalent for non-text content that can be
expressed into words. However, in the techniques document, the ALT-attribute
is the only technique that is presented to provide a text equivalent for an
image.  Reading the techniques document, I would think that I still had to
provide an alt-text for an image, even if (the same) text was already used
as a 'caption' for the image on the page. 
I think this is unfortunate and narrows the intentions of the WCAG 2

Yvette Hoitink
CEO Heritas, Enschede, The Netherlands
Received on Friday, 31 October 2003 10:58:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:46 UTC