W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2003

RE: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in words

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 03:22:15 -0500
To: "'Jonathan Chetwynd'" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>, "'WAI GL'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-id: <007601c349e1$0edb05d0$28c81844@USD320002X>
Hi Jonathan,

Yes, there is

It is under "Understandable"

Guideline 1 only acts to make sure it is within perception of the user.

Guideline 3 is focused on making it fall within the understanding of the
user.

 

 
Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Jonathan Chetwynd
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:31 AM
To: WAI GL
Subject: Re: REF 1.1a - Add definition to 1.1 for ability to be expressed in
words

 

Guideline 1: PERCEIVABLE. Make Content Perceivable by Any User

First let me apologise for not having been a regular participant, and
missing Venice f2f.

It does seem a concern that having tabled such a broad Guideline as stated
above, 
we then get embroiled immediately in the nitty gritty, it seems once again
that we have reverted to text equivalents, which is only one of the very
many possibilities that this porisma offers.

Is there a provision to provide illustration for text, which is a natural
outcome.

Jonathan 
Received on Monday, 14 July 2003 04:22:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:25 GMT