W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: numbering proposal

From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 07:04:19 +0000
Cc: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
To: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
Message-Id: <2BD409BA-5AA2-11D7-A166-0003939B5AD0@btinternet.com>

why not consider *, **, ***.  or any other easily found and positive 
symbol such as @, @@, and @@@, which could be agreed on.

the problem with 3 different symbols. is that the order is not 
apparent. 1st is great but so is 3/3, so is one better than three? 
Whereas most people accept that more of the same is better, even though 
this ain't necessarily so.

I don't see any problem staying with A, AA, and AAA, 2.0 is a different 
standard, so it's just different.
'Crowns' were a coin for (half) a millennia though the value changed, 
and Dollars are no longer solid silver.

Received on Thursday, 20 March 2003 02:01:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:43 UTC