- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 07:04:19 +0000
- To: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Cc: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
why not consider *, **, ***. or any other easily found and positive symbol such as @, @@, and @@@, which could be agreed on. the problem with 3 different symbols. is that the order is not apparent. 1st is great but so is 3/3, so is one better than three? Whereas most people accept that more of the same is better, even though this ain't necessarily so. I don't see any problem staying with A, AA, and AAA, 2.0 is a different standard, so it's just different. 'Crowns' were a coin for (half) a millennia though the value changed, and Dollars are no longer solid silver. Jonathan
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2003 02:01:52 UTC