- From: Matt May <mcmay@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 18:04:37 -0800
- To: gv@trace.wisc.edu
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 04:41 PM, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: > Oh AND, someone pointed out that if we use that numbering scheme - > that it > doesn't translate to other languages. I said that. > But if we use > 1-2-1-4 > it says nothing. No clue as to what it means or belongs to...... > hmmmmmm. I think M, S, and T are needless redefinitions. Nobody outside of this list will know or care what they mean. A, AA, and AAA are at least recognizable. If it's a matter of screen-reader capability, then I suggest the terms spelled out: "A", "double A" and "triple A". Or something else that's sequential, like A, B, and C. - m
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2003 21:04:34 UTC