W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: 4.1 newest version -- resubmitted

From: Avi Arditti <aardit@voa.gov>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:52:28 -0500
Message-ID: <3E6DF82C.5F3B5896@voa.gov>
To: Maurizio Boscarol <maurizio@usabile.it>
CC: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>, Lee Roberts <leeroberts@roserockdesign.com>, John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>

Hi Maurizio,

I think "readability" does sound better than "care." How about this
rewrite of Level 1/Item 6:

6. readability of all-capital letters when used where normal sentence
case might increase comprehension. 

Please send me some of that real Italian coffee you're drinking!

Thanks,
Avi

Maurizio Boscarol wrote:
> 
> From: "Avi Arditti"
> > You meet Checkpoint 4.1 at the Minimum Level if you review the content
> > with items such as these in mind:
> (..)
> > 6. care in the use of all-capital letters where normal sentence case
> > might increase comprehension
> 
> Should this be 'readability' or comprehension? Yes, comprehension is
> improved by readability, but capitalizing reduce readability first. Or,
> better, the recognizability of letters... it's an ininfluent issue, just
> a my post-coffee mumble? ;-)
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2003 09:52:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:21 GMT