W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: Conformance Claims and Logo

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 13:27:37 -0600
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-id: <00af01c2ce15$cf0ce8c0$ac17a8c0@TOSHIBATABLET>

Great.  Nice analogy

Now - a couple more questions.  

How does the server know that it should deliver content from the "virtual
mirror" site vs the standard site?

And does this happen automatically for subsequent pages?

And if it does automatically, - what if it was only needed for the one page
and not subsequent pages?

Just trying to figure this all out.

Thanks

 
Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:44 AM
To: Lisa Seeman; gv@trace.wisc.edu; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Re: Conformance Claims and Logo


Great exposition :)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lisa Seeman" <seeman@netvision.net.il>
To: <gv@trace.wisc.edu>; <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:36 PM
Subject: RE: Conformance Claims and Logo


No one has to understand  RDF

in fact, with the approach we are working on  even the user agents will not
have to understand RDF. This is a server side solution. The RDF allows a
service or server to render an alternive accessible rendering of each site.
you can think of it as an accessible mirror site, (although this is a
simplification)
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2003 14:29:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:21 GMT