- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:41:19 +0100
- To: <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu> To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:47 AM Subject: RE: Conformance Claims and Logo A few questions. 1. Would this be accessible if the person couldn't handle RDF or RSS? Roberto: This technology must be handled by "server side scripting" (ASP, PHP, CF, ..) but also as "client side scripting" (an example here http://www.jsdir.com/goonline/esempio.asp?id=7). So there is opportunity for all to "catch" contents also with XHTML (remember that RSS is well-formatted "like" XML). Gregg Vanderheiden: 2. Are we requiring that users have RDF or RSS savvy access? Even on public systems? 3. Is RDF / RSS savvy user agents our baseline for the guidelines? Roberto: I think we are going in the wrong direction... the original question is: if an application/content could not be made accessible (for copyright, etc.), how can the user make a content accessible for respect the "claim".
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2003 04:41:27 UTC