W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2003

16 Jan 2003 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes

From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:13:52 -0500
Message-Id: <>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

Available at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2003/01/16-minutes.html

Short summary:
- we discussed and resolved issues with 2.1 .
- we discussed the techniques requirements.  we have a couple resolutions 
of changes to make. decided to make changes, let it sit for a week, ask for 
issues at next week's call and if no show stoppers publish to TR next Friday
- discussed dates for F2F at CSUN.  wendy sent options to the list for voting.
- discussed conformance logos and gregg's proposal re: conformance to 1.0 
and 2.0.  gregg and jason took action items to propose text for inclusion 
in conformance section.

Summary of action Items and resolutions
- resolution: checkpoint text (2.1): Ensure that all of the functionality 
is operable, at a minimum, through the keyboard or other character input 
device. word success criterion accordingly (will say basically the same 
thing but in success criterion language)
- resolution: ensure that our use of the word content is consistent with 
other guidelines.
- action editors: take use of word content to xtech (for glossary discussion)
- resolution: delete level 2 criterion.
- resolution: make addition to benefits ala wendy's proposal (ala 
interpretation of comments from aaron and WWAAC folks)
- resolution (reqs for techs): replace "human testable" with "reliably 
human testable"
- resolution (reqs for techs): replace "untestable" with "not reliably 
- resolution (reqs for techs): replace "human evaluators" with 
"knowledgeable human evaluators"
- resolution (reqs for techs): incorporate these resolutions, publish back 
to list, check in with folks at next thursday's meeting, if ok, then move 
- action wendy: send set of proposals (for csun f2f dates) to the list for 
different votes and ask people to vote.
- action gregg: draft resolution (related to proposal about conforming to 
1.0 vs 2.0) so that can be reflected in the conformance section of the 
guidelines (ways of reporting and use of logo). deadline: 3 weeks from now
- action jason: draft something after gregg finishes submits his proposal 
(about making conformance claims).

Please send corrections and omissions.


wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2003 22:13:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:43 UTC