W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: [TECH] Requirements for Techniques v0.3

From: Lisa Seeman <lisa@UBaccess.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 09:27:26 +0200
To: WCAG List <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-id: <00f201c2b48b$e62a9780$7000000a@123>

I think training stuff is more for the education and outreach working
group.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
To: "WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [TECH] Requirements for Techniques v0.3


>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Slatin" <john_slatin@forum.utexas.edu>
> To: "Michael Cooper" <michaelc@watchfire.com>; "Web Content Guidelines"
> <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [TECH] Requirements for Techniques v0.3
>
>
> >I propose that we add the following group of prospective users for the
> Techniques documents:
>
> >Trainers/developers of training.
>
> >Rationale: People who develop accessibility training materials and
programs
> need access to clear, detailed documentation >of techniques for meeting
WCAG
> 2 checkpoints and success criteria.  Some of these people may be members
of
> EO, who need >the best materials we can supply.
>
> >WCAG is no longer the only game in town, especially in the US.  Helping
> trainers see how WCAG 2 techniques documents can >help them provide
> excellent training is also a way to get the trainers on our side, i.e.,
turn
> them into advocates for >WCAG 2.0.
>
> Yes... i think it is right!
>
> This night i will read all the tecniques and i will mail tomorrow my
> suggestion ;)
>
Received on Sunday, 5 January 2003 02:28:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:21 GMT