W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: [166] Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 03:16:31 -0400 (EDT)
To: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
cc: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0306230304260.17496-100000@tux.w3.org>

On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Joe Clark wrote:

>>I agree that the requirements should not be fashioned around any
>>paarticular authoring tool. The requirement is to avoid doing
>>something which happens to be stupid, but also happens to be
>>perfectly valid according to all the
>>relevant specifications except WCAG, and was even done by a tool
>>(not just a coupe of perverse authors).
>I agree in principle, but it will be difficult for WAI, as opposed to
>some other group at W3C, to impose semantically-correct Web authoring
>rather than syntactically-correct authoring (e.g., <h1> vs.

"Au contraire, mon ami". Actually I think that WCAG is one of the groups
which is relatively successful in getting people to use semantically-correct
code, and not just syntactically correct code. In terms of authoring I
actually think that the Authoring Tools group has more impact, but they rely
on WCAG for a lot of basic specification.

>>This is not perfect either - the default stylesheet for SVG doesn't
>>work for any useful images.
>Anyone care to explain that?

SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) has a default style sheet to ensure that all
valid SVG produces some image even when no presentation information has been
given. The default stylsheet provides a silhouette - which is generally not

>>And just to remind Joe, who seems to identify me with WAI,
>Uh, no. Whenever possible, when a contributor to this esteemed list
>makes a statement that WAI (read well: WAI) is apt to simply accept
>and run with, I admonish WAI (nota bene: WAI) not to do so. In those
>cases, I respond to an author's remarks *to* the list and *to* WAI.

OK, I hadn't understood that before. (It seems you should admonish the WCAG
group actually, but that's a detail one might miss when working in the

>>I don't work for WAI...
>Yeah, we know, despite Charles's return address being charles@w3.org

I work for W3C. WAI is a part of W3C. All people who work for IBM's
accessibility unit work for IBM. People who work for IBM generally don't work
for, nor represent, IBM's accessibility unit.

Charles McCathieNevile  http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  tel: +61 409 134 136
SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe         fax(france): +33 4 92 38 78 22
 Post:   21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia    or
 W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Monday, 23 June 2003 03:16:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:59:27 UTC