Re: best practices vs techniques

• From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
• Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 12:35:01 +1000
• To: "David MacDonald" <befree@magma.ca>
• Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <16114.29397.194473.337899@jdc.local>

David MacDonald writes:
 > I also looked to see if there were any items in the Techniques document
 > that I thought should be repositioned as Best Practices.  
 > 
 >  
 > 
 > The action item as I understand it was to review the best practices and
 > the techniques document to discern if there were Techniques that would
 > be better in Best Practices and Vice Versa and to discuss with Michael
 > if we agree with the current way Best Practices and Techniques are
 > handled.

Yes, that was the action item, referring to what used to be called
"core" techniques (now called "cross-technology" or "general" or...
techniques - see the separate thread on that subject).

Received on Thursday, 19 June 2003 22:35:19 UTC