W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: 5.2

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 18:41:58 +0100
Message-ID: <00af01c2b02a$c5ae88a0$0100a8c0@NBRSIWA>
To: "John Slatin" <john_slatin@forum.utexas.edu>, "Lee Roberts" <leeroberts@roserockdesign.com>, "'Lisa Seeman'" <lisa@UBaccess.com>
Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>


----- Original Message -----
From: "John Slatin" <john_slatin@forum.utexas.edu>
To: "Lee Roberts" <leeroberts@roserockdesign.com>; "'Lisa Seeman'"
<lisa@UBaccess.com>
Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: 5.2


>For example:
>"The content uses technologies, including assistive technologies,  that are
available in multiple implementations for >different operating systems."
>
>Would this come close?

I suggest to change it with:

"The content use technologies, including assistive technologies, that are
available in different operating systems"

I think that "multiple implementations" could be difficoult to understand
and to define, also is to explain well about "different opertating systems".

For example, if i have a tecnology that works for Windows 98/2000/XP i
respect the request because it is available in three different operating
systems.

But the request must be focused that my content will be usable in Windows
and Mac, for example.
Received on Monday, 30 December 2002 12:42:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:20 GMT