Jason White writes: "I think the simplest and most accurate mode of expression is to say that there exist multiple, independent and interoperable implementations of the technologies (i.e., formats, protocols, API's etc.) used by the content." I concur with this thought. Should we say: The content must be supported by multiple, independent, and interoperable implementations of the technologies (i.e., formats, protocols, API's, etc.) required for the content. Using the above terminology removes the possible confusion that a screen reader like JAWS or Window Eyes would be counted as two independent implementations. For both of them to work they require the MSAA, that in itself would be counted as one API. Sincerely, Lee Roberts President/CEO 405-321-6372 Rose Rock Design, Inc. http://www.roserockdesign.comReceived on Thursday, 26 December 2002 01:51:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 02:50:59 GMT