RE: Numbering Success Criteria

Hi Wendy,

I find all numbering schemes a bit confusing and arbitrary, so don't find
anything much to pick between them. The only thing that seems important to me
is that they each have a URI (and that's for machine-processing, so it
doesn't matter what it seems like to a person, although it is arguably
helpful if they match).

(I do think this is a good thing to do, so a second for John's vote of thanks
:)

Cheers

Chaals

On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, john_slatin wrote:

>
>Wendy,
>
>Thanks for this.  On first pass I found all four methods confusing as JAWS
>read your message aloud.  On the next pass, though, I found Method 4 less
>confusing than the other three, so I'll go with that one for now.
>
>Are such numbering schemes likely to prove difficult for people with
>learning disabilities or other cognitive difficulties? Are there other
>methods that we should be considering, either instead of these or as
>supplements, to help people keep track of where they are in the scheme of
>things?
>
>John
>