W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: Organization of WCAG 2.0 and checklists

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:47:04 +0100
Message-ID: <003301c280fd$39287870$5ffefea9@NBRSIWA>
To: "Web Content Guidelines" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>


----- Original Message -----
From: "Doyle B" <doyleb@alaska.net>
To: <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>; "Web Content Guidelines"
<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: Organization of WCAG 2.0 and checklists


>
> I fully agree with Jason...putting the explanations one level deeper than
> the guidelines is not a good idea.  They should be together as is the case
> with other sets of guidelines.  Keeping them this way will make it easier
> for first time readers for sure.
>
> Doyle Burnett
>
> Special Education Service Agency
> Anchorage, Alaska

I agree too... as i told also in my last post, i think that we need to put a
paragraph about the control of the validation logo. There is a rep inside
W3C that has the authority to ask logo removal for not correct exposition in
web sites? I think that, for example, if we let to put A, AA, AAA to web
sites that are not conforming to the guidelines some developers could take
these web sites as example (a good example for them but a wrong application
of guidelines).

What do you think about?
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 11:47:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:20 GMT