W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: Action item - claiming conformance at Level 2 or 3

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 21:01:40 +0200
Message-ID: <017901c251ea$02d66f80$103cfea9@notebook>
To: <gian@stanleymilford.com.au>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>


Hi,
i think option 2 is more "clear" but tecnically i think is best to use
option 1.

Also, about my IRC message in the last meeting:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2002/08/29-minutes.html

"I suggest for "conformity" of the document to use in Appendix B the same
style of paragraph of level 2 and three, starting level one with "At level
1,..."

have the group considered this change?

----- Original Message -----
From: <gian@stanleymilford.com.au>
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:56 AM
Subject: Action item - claiming conformance at Level 2 or 3


Hi,

If you could respond to the list as to which one you like the most -
that way we can see if there's a definate favourite and finalise it next
teleconference.

The original wording:
A conformance claim associated with the content asserts conformance to
this checkpoint at level 2 or level 3.

Option 1:
A conformance claim associated with the content asserts conformance to
this checkpoint at the relevant level (level 2 or level 3).

Option 2:
Conformance to this checkpoint is asserted. The conformance claim
specifies at which level the site conforms to this checkpoint (level 2
or level 3).

Option 3:
The site asserts conformance to this checkpoint and specifies the level
claimed (level 2 or level 3).

Cheers,
Gian

Gian Sampson-Wild
Accessibility Specialist

Member: Web Content Accessibility Group Working Group
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative

Stanley & Milford
A Software Communication Group Company
Level 16
644 Chapel Street
South Yarra VIC 3141
Australia
Tel. 613 9826 5829
Fax. 613 9826 8336
Mob. 0404 498 030
Email gian@stanleymilford.com.au
Web: www.stanleymilford.com.au

********************************************
This message contains privileged and confidential information intended
only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the
intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or
take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in
error, please notify Software Communication Group immediately. Any views
expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except
where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Software
Communication Group.
********************************************
Received on Sunday, 1 September 2002 15:01:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:20 GMT