Sorry, I always forget the reply to the list... :( Wendy A Chisholm wrote: > The metadata discussion was formalized in the WCAG 1.0 Errata at: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WAI-WEBCONTENT-ERRATA Thanks for URL Wendy, I have just a question about it. Referring to example, the level of conformance is within this part of code: ... ratings (c 1)) ... Right? Where: WAI-A is (c 0)) WAI-AA is (c 1)) WAI-AAA is (c 2)) So, if I'll be able to declare WAI-AAA conformance, I'll use this PICS: <META http-equiv="PICS-Label" content='(PICS-1.1 "http://www.w3.org/wai/wcag-conformance" labels exp "1999.12.31" for "http://www.bazzmann.com/" by "marco@bazzmann.com" ratings (c 2))'> Is it correct? -- Bazzmann Labs(c) - Accessibilita', usabilita', webdesign e standard W3C ::--------------------------------::---------------------------------:: http://www.bazzmann.it | Il sito ufficiale di Bazzmann Labs. http://www.bazzmann.com | La risorsa per informare e aggiornare. http://www.dev2dev.it | Elemento D2D002Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2002 06:08:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:19 GMT