W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2002

RE: "Wide applicability" was Trying to better explain concern about mappingtechnology-specificsto success criteria

From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:47:41 +1000
Message-ID: <15669.1277.370953.422497@jdc.local>
To: GV@trace.wisc.edu
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

My memory concurs with Gregg's: the issue was whether tools had been
created or could feasibly be created, with reasonable time and effort,
to solve the problem, and could then be available at no (or low) cost.
Given the tools, the problem would no longer reside with the content
developer.

The proposal was: let's not make this a priority 1 item for the author
unless it is shown to be necessary (i.e., a technological solution
isn't feasible).
Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2002 01:47:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:19 GMT