- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 20:04:02 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Ben Caldwell <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>
- cc: "'Lisa Seeman'" <seeman@netvision.net.il>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Ben Caldwell wrote: Hi Lisa, According to the minutes from June 6th (http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2002/06/06-minutes.html), there were no objections to moving forward with publication on this checkpoint. CMN I had been under the impression that consensus wasdetermined on the list, based on decisions of meetings. I admit that I have not been an active member of the group recently, but could someone please clarify if this is the case? (Not that it has any material effect here, just that it seems unclear). As indicated in the reviewer's note at the end of checkpoint 4.1 in the new draft, there is an outstanding action item for Gregg and I to compile a list of ideas related to 4.1. This list will serve as a basis for future discussion related to evolving this checkpoint. I would suggest as a basis the well compiled information recently posted to the list on this topic under the title "all together" by Lisa: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2002AprJun/0387 cheers Chaals
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2002 20:04:04 UTC