W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: new draft is up

From: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 08:04:00 +0200
To: "'Ben Caldwell'" <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-id: <000601c21da0$6f4bb2c0$3100000a@lisa>
sorry if I am being thick. I quoted the wrong meeting, - i meant HYPERLINK
"http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2002/06/06-minutes.html"http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2
002/06/06-minutes.html
 
but i see on the minutes there:
 
GV The 4.1 checkpoint be a rendition of "write as clearly and simply as
[appropriate | possible] for content." Not talk about audience. Then no
success criteria levels. provide a partial list of ideas and a note about it
being under development.

JS Maybe be a bit further and say that the list will be broken out into
different conformance levels. Give some indication of what might happen to
them.

then there is consensus taking.
followed by a slight change in wording to:
 
"write as simply as [appropriate | possible] for the purpose of the
content."
 
 
 
Thanks,
Lisa

 -----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org]On Behalf
Of Ben Caldwell
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:43 AM
To: 'Lisa Seeman'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: new draft is up



Hi Lisa,

 

According to the minutes from June 6th ( HYPERLINK
"http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2002/06/06-minutes.html"http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2
002/06/06-minutes.html), there were no objections to moving forward with
publication on this checkpoint.

 

As indicated in the reviewer’s note at the end of checkpoint 4.1 in the new
draft, there is an outstanding action item for Gregg and I to compile a list
of ideas related to 4.1. This list will serve as a basis for future
discussion related to evolving this checkpoint.

 

-Ben

 

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Lisa Seeman
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:28 AM
To: 'Ben Caldwell'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: new draft is up

 

I still do not see the results from the call on 4.1 from  the Minutes from
May 30 Teleconference

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org]On Behalf
Of Ben Caldwell
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:02 AM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: new draft is up

Hi,

 

I just posted a new working draft for WCAG 2 that reflects the evolution of
the document since the April 24 draft. Please let us know if you spot any
errors, omissions or other items to be addressed so that we can incorporate
them before the draft moves on to publication on the W3C's Technical Reports
page, and subsequent public review.

 

HYPERLINK
"http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-20020626.html"http://www.w3.org/W
AI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-20020626.html

 

Thanks,

 

-Ben

--
Ben Caldwell | HYPERLINK
"mailto:caldwell@trace.wisc.edu"caldwell@trace.wisc.edu
Trace Research and Development Center ( HYPERLINK
"http://trace.wisc.edu"http://trace.wisc.edu)  

 

 

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.371 / Virus Database: 206 - Release Date: 6/13/02


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.371 / Virus Database: 206 - Release Date: 6/13/02



---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.371 / Virus Database: 206 - Release Date: 6/13/02



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.371 / Virus Database: 206 - Release Date: 6/13/02
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2002 01:00:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:19 GMT