W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: Sifting the gold

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 20:10:07 -0400 (EDT)
To: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
cc: <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0206102007580.15332-100000@tux.w3.org>

My suggestion was that we collect the things that have been proposed, and
work out if we can use them as success criteria - i.e. if they can be written
to be testable and true.

I suspect in some cases there will be different criteria for different
languages.

  	-----Original Message-----
  	From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU]

  	Here are some of the comments I found in recent posts that I
  think we should grab and hold.   They are the suggestions I could find
  in the discourse.  And suggestions is what we need to work from.

[snip]
  	From Charles
[snip]
  	One of the suggested success criteria from the meeting in
  Melbourne was that the appropriate terms be used.

  	Most of the suggestions have been to do with ways of writing a
  sentence or a paragraph. They are very similar to the suggestions we
  seem to accept of ways to structure a page or a collection of pages

  	{GV NOTE:  I think he is saying that we should start collecting
  some of the ADVICE items not as success criteria but as the list of
  things you can do and should consider --- just as we did for structure
  etc.  Is that right Charles? - or did I miss it.}
Received on Monday, 10 June 2002 20:10:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:19 GMT