W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: WAI Quick Tips Update for WCAG 2.0

From: <gian@stanleymilford.com.au>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 09:38:24 +1000
Message-Id: <H00000e0004b71fb.1023665903.tux.sofcom.com.au@MHS>
TO: hbingham@acm.org, mcmay@bestkungfu.com, w3c-wai-eo@w3.org, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I think this is a good idea - perhaps the Quick Tips could be used to
explain these categories (perceivable, comprehensible etc) as general
concepts. Maybe we could pick out one checkpoint from each that best
represents the category.
Gian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mcmay [mailto:mcmay@bestkungfu.com]
> Sent: Sunday, 9 June 2002 12:29 AM
> To: w3c-wai-gl; w3c-wai-eo; hbingham
> Subject: Re: WAI Quick Tips Update for WCAG 2.0
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Harvey Bingham" <hbingham@acm.org>
> > I wonder if the guidelines work should include an update to 
> that resource,
> > originally produced by EO? Or should it be an EO work item?
> > I presume the right time to produce this is after it becomes a
> recommendation.
> 
> While I believe that the quick tips will always conceptually 
> address the
> issues in any WCAG document for the foreseeable future, I 
> think there may be
> a time around the later stages of the document (say, in Candidate or
> Proposed Rec) that we and EO get together and discuss perhaps 
> reordering
> them. The WCAG 2 document doesn't substantially differ from 
> anything in the
> Quick Tips, but it has moved to a structure (Perceivable, 
> Comprehensible,
> etc.) that could translate well into Quick Tips.
> 
> That is to say, maybe the content of the Quick Tips itself 
> doesn't need to
> be changed, but the way it's organized could be modified to 
> harmonize better
> with WCAG 2.
> 
> -
> m
> 
> 
> 
Received on Sunday, 9 June 2002 19:37:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:19 GMT